Would love to see the whole list, but it is pretty similar to his last top draft eligible players lists. Kind of surprising that a guy who follows developmental hockey as much as Pronman claims to would see every one of the players just drafted as besting guys from superior classes or that have a year or two of development under their belts. Of course, this is just seeing the top 10 and not getting a chance to understand his method or reasoning for evaluation. Can the OP shed some light on this?
|