Quote:
Originally Posted by thymebalm
|
No, no it is not saying what you are trying to say. It is saying for Edwards himself to sell off his shares or something since he is the direct owner of those shares of the company. That he needs to do something about it since he is part owner. Nowhere does it say that the flames, nhl, or anyone not named edwards and not tied to the company is responsible for anything.
What you were trying to say is that the NHL and Flames were somehow also responsible. Your logic is failing so much at that level. The flames and NHL have 0 anything for this mine issue, and 0 responsibility.
if the 36% ownership was titled to the 'Calgary flames' it would be a different story, but hey, it's not.
Emailing the NHL or flames about this is as useful as me going to the prime minister and asking for immunity on all future crimes I do, there is absolutely 0 logic to this reasoning.