View Single Post
Old 08-11-2014, 01:45 PM   #45
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Is Wine-Tasting Junk Science?

http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2014/0...g-junk-science

Connoisseurship of this sort, however, is in bad repute these days. An article published in the Guardian last summer titled reviews studies purporting to show that when it comes to wine, even the experts are unreliable guides. It isn't just that they disagree among themselves in the values and qualities of wines; they disagree with themselves from one minute to the next in evaluating the very same wine poured from the very same bottle.

http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandst...ience-analysis

Experiments have shown that people can't tell plonk from grand cru. Now one US winemaker claims that even experts can't judge wine accurately. What's the science behind the taste?


Hodgson's findings have stunned the wine industry. Over the years he has shown again and again that even trained, professional palates are terrible at judging wine.

"The results are disturbing," says Hodgson from the Fieldbrook Winery in Humboldt County, described by its owner as a rural paradise. "Only about 10% of judges are consistent and those judges who were consistent one year were ordinary the next year.

"Chance has a great deal to do with the awards that wines win."

Last edited by troutman; 08-11-2014 at 01:55 PM.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post: