Quote:
Originally Posted by Chill Cosby
If you actually read the article, it sounds like OP used selected quotes to tell only part of the story:
So, he's still all for disclosing the financials which would still allow the public to see the paper trail, but in a more respectful and less attack-driven way.
He doesn't want to stop disclosure, just change the act. Doesn't even seem like news.
|
http://www.vancouversun.com/business...#ixzz3A6sCrA5o
Quote:
|
He began a response to a yes-or-no question on Liberal policy by saying “whether we keep this legislation …” but quickly corrected himself, saying: “Actually, I wouldn’t keep the legislation in place.
|
He's saying he would scrap the current legisation
Quote:
|
I would work with First Nations to make sure that a proper accountability act that would have disclosed any excesses we see, but is done in a way that is respectful of the First Nation communities.”
|
He'll replace the legislation with something else.
Quote:
|
Neither he nor a party official would specifically commit to a law that requires chiefs and councillors to make their remuneration available not just to band members but Canadians at large.
|
The new legislation may or may not require salary figures to be available to the general public. They're not saying.