View Single Post
Old 08-05-2014, 08:59 PM   #339
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
Chemicals have always been used regardless of what variety of seed was planted. As such, chemicals have always been a problem considering their danger to the environment around them.

GMO crops like RR Canola have created a more efficient way to spray chemicals. The question will always be, is the trade off worth it? Whether people want to admit it or not, superweeds are becoming more of a problem.

I know many farmers that have struggled to get good yields with RR varieties. That has lead to a lot of new research being done by Monsanto and Bayer. Talking to some Monsanto guys, they are trying to figure out a way to move away from RR and towards something better, but it will take some time. They do realize the superweed problem. Nature has a mean way of dealing with manmade products..
Are you against GMOs, or are you against the over-use of pesticides?

They are different things.

As for Monsanto wanting to move away from RR crops, you're right. But what they'll move to will just be a crop resistant to a different chemical, in particular, a chemical that Monsanto holds a patent on ($$$). Monsanto lost control of the glyphosate ('Roundup') market years ago, and in doing so lost market share in the 'RoundUp' brand, costing them countless millions of dollars.
The Fonz is offline   Reply With Quote