Quote:
Originally Posted by edslunch
Can we put this it was the scout not the GM thing to bed? The GM is responsible for everything the team does. If he chooses not to overrule his scouts that's still a choice. He's responsible for the scouts, the broad draft criteria and actually making the pick. I have no problem if he delegates to his staff but the buck still stops with him. History will judge that he is a good or bad drafter regardless how he went about it
|
can he get credit/critisism if he didn't watch a single game? There is a article (referenced here on CP) that one of the years Feaster was a GM, he did not watch a single junior hockey game.