Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo
Don't be obtuse. You know exactly what Hamas is accused of doing and that Globe and Mail article shows exactly how they try and hide amongst the civilian population. Also if you don't think Hamas strategically places their hideouts and munitions in and around hospitals and schools, well then your head is buried deeper in the sand than I thought.
|
Well that's not what you said, is it? That's why I asked for clarification, because your first comment did not line up with the reality of the situation (it was simply dismissive of that report using a silly and unrealistic example).
http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/23/world/...t-controversy/
Quote:
|
"It would be impossible at this point to say how much truth there is to the human shield argument," said Michele Dunne of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "That's not going to be possible to do in the heat of the conflict."
|
Quote:
|
"Civilian casualties on the Palestinian side are very high. That is something Hamas can use in the court of public opinion. Israel has to have an answer to that: The civilian casualties are so high because of Hamas, and this is their answer to that."
|
Enough with the condescending language, can you debate this in a civil way without accusing people of having their head in the sand or being obtuse? I asked you a question because I wanted clarification on what your definition was. Quit insulting people, please.