Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
As you were trying to f#%k with our brains with odds you forgot that our star is relatively young compared to other similar stars that scientist think have "goldilocks" planets.Or even that we may not even need a star similar to our sun for life to exist and advance.
And I really don't think Moores law will ever have anything to do with the odds of evolution or odds of life in the cosmo's.
|
Biodiversity expands as a factor of its current self, not at a set rate.
And i did consider age, I was not discussing age of living things. I was discussing odds that big evolutionary leaps would happen. I gave it 5%. I thought that was overly fair. Earth sat lifeless for 70% of its existence.
Like I said it was just a thought about how a 100 M planets with life would translate into only 100's planets with intelligent (Math & Science) life, vary quickly. Until we get out there there is really no way of knowing where we lay on the scale of intelligent life, but I was suggesting the scale might be much smaller than some are suggesting.