View Single Post
Old 07-23-2014, 09:28 AM   #49
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
They are spending 600k on signage. This could provide traffic calming that actually reduces traffic speed at two locations. Signage does very little to reduce speed.
Traffic Calming is the worst idea in the history of urban engineering.

Problem - people are cutting across communities because the main routes are ineffective at moving traffic.

Solution - create a series of dead ends and put bumps and stop signs all over the road so that people are constantly breaking and accelerating to maintain the posted speed limit. I should add, on an individual level its not really an issue but happening millions of times each week across the city, this will cause needless additional wear and tear on peoples vehicles and burn addition fuel. The Environmentalists should be pissed.

How about we try an easier solutions like, raising speed limits to a reasonable level, and posting speed minimums. So people move at the same speed, get from point A to point B faster, therefor spending less time on the roads and reducing congestion. This would reduce residential short cuts, and probably as an extension of that reduce people speed passed playgrounds.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to #-3 For This Useful Post: