Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan
You're the one who used the anomaly Holak, as an example along with the rest of your pie in the sky might be s, which is so far all you've got.
|
Do you even know what you're upset about at this point?
I haven't the foggiest what you meant by pie in the sky "be s" either. I've been pretty rational about Jankowski. Said he needs to improve offensively and engage physically more, also noted that his two way game and ability in the face off dot are two areas he's ahead of the game. Saying he won't be in the NHL for 7 years after being drafted is a little silly too. It's possible after his 4th year he gets cups of coffee after turning pro, like Colborne did etc. Personally I think there is an outside chance he turns pro next summer.
The 11th round is the first time I've cast my vote for Jankowski, so I'm obviously not over the moon for him, I just think your constant negativity is a little too much and after you've exhausted yourself you tend to break down into childish posts, like the one above.
You'd be better off if you actually watch his games with any consistency and look to posters like sureLoss who have put his numbers into proper context. Though I realize ignoring those posts is easier for you.