Quote:
Originally Posted by Chill Cosby
I've got nothing against you personally, I promise! but I was just reminded of something that's always bugged me, so sorry in advance:
People who complain about the plausibility of science fiction movies.
The way they handled the fictional element of time travel didn't seem plausible to you? The fictional serum the guy took didn't have a medically plausible outcome to you? Telekinetic powers aren't a reasonably plausible outcome of the fictional act of "unlocking" percentages of the human brain you say? The completely fictional alternate-worlds they've created where these things are a reality include elements that are TOO fictional for you?
Cool.
|
There is a difference. If they take a premise that has already been determined to be false, for decades, and use it as their base then it is tough to buy in. If they use some future-tech that has not been invented yet you can buy-in.