Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC
That makes no sense to me. The point of the poll is to see where the board's overall opinion lies to get a semi-accurate look at where our prospects rank. If this was to be a blind survey, done all at once where people order their picks, that would be the result I think we're trying to get here. Like voting for awards. People give first place, second place votes etc..
I look at like we all have a list of where we think prospects are, if we combined those lists, what would the rankings be? Voting for players multiple times skews that.
|
The way that this ranking is selected makes more sense to get an overall sense of who the best prospect is per CP's opinion. It's logical to me to continuously pick the guy who you consider the
best remaining on the table until he's gone then and not simply because you had him #3 or #4 on your overall list. We're making a ranking list - not comparing ranking lists.
If for example after Gaudreau and Bennett - I felt instead of Granlund or Poirier I believed Klimchuk deserved to be #3, and Poirier went instead, would it make sense to
not pick Klimchuk the next chance I get, if I felt he was the best?