View Single Post
Old 07-16-2014, 11:51 AM   #2068
Maritime Q-Scout
Ben
 
Maritime Q-Scout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: God's Country (aka Cape Breton Island)
Exp:
Default

Just a few things to keep in mind:

1) The Bell Centre lost a ton of money. In fact the only privately funded arena that turned a profit is the ACC. Preaching that smart businessmen should lose money on a venture because, well because others did it, isn't a good argument.

2) I don't believe the alternative to a new rink is the team moving. The alternative is the team remaining in the Saddledome, with free agents passing due to the lack of amenities and the Flames turning into (or remaining) a team that has poor on ice results but puts dollars in owners pockets.

3) Sports isn't your standard business. There are two goals, to make money, and win championships. The two are linked but not mutually interdependent.

4) An arena is a public good. This isn't an office tower with restricted access, it's a venue for the community. Or at least the new rink should be.


There's a balancing at here. It's a matter of finding the sweet spot (mind you given Calgary's factors I wouldn't be surprised if the sweet spot is $0, but no one has presented that argument, only "oil companies should build hockey rinks because they have money")
__________________

"Calgary Flames is the best team in all the land" - My Brainwashed Son
Maritime Q-Scout is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Maritime Q-Scout For This Useful Post: