Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth
I dunno, just read it as "well, he didn't go there to kill the kid".
Does it really change the fact that he killed the kid?
Overreaction on my part.
|
Understandable, but at the same time, it is also the most logical explanation given Garland's history with the victims. The charges bear that out - Two first degree charges because the crown believes he went there with the intention to kill the grandparents. A second degree charge for the child, who was simply on a sleepover on the wrong night.
Devastating.