Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Fan, Ph.D.
For me it's all about trajectory.
Gaudreau at #1 makes perfect sense as he has upped his game at every subsequent level and every subsequent year. Bennett at second, to me, would be based on a very different set of criteria than the one people used to rate Gaudreau at 1. I think that if we're being consistent on the criteria, Bennett can't be #2.
|
That makes sense, but I take issue with your criteria. In my opinion, we all benefit from having a base from which to track rankings through each prospect's history with the team, as I explain in the above post.