Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
Okay, so let's assume the owners just want to support NHL hockey in Calgary, and a new arena has enough value to the citizens of Calgary that it's judged worthwhile put up half the money for the project. Then why shouldn't the city simply assume 50 per cent ownership of the arena, and take in 50 per cent of the revenue from it?
|
That's my thinking too. If we're going to put in money, fine. But then we better be getting a cut of the profits too.