Okay, so let's assume the owners just want to support NHL hockey in Calgary, and a new arena has enough value to the citizens of Calgary that it's judged worthwhile put up half the money for the project. Then why shouldn't the city simply assume 50 per cent ownership of the arena, and take in 50 per cent of the revenue from it?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|