Quote:
Originally Posted by BigNumbers
Further to your rather pompous tone: http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/cr-cj/fing...aq-eng.htm#a10
These fingerprints are collected in this situation under the auspices of the Canadian Criminal Real Time Identification Services and as such, per the RCMP:
" The fingerprints are not added to the RCMP National Repository of Criminal Records and are not searched for future purposes."
Further: The RCMP destroys fingerprint submissions 90 days after a search is completed and the results are returned to the police service.
The only way to get into the database is to be added to the RCMP National Repository of Criminal Records as is noted above. Volunteering you fingerprints under CCRTIS will not result in your prints going into the NRCR. |
Let's be clear here, since we're all adults:
-I'm not intentionally pompous. If I am, I apologize. Were I pompous by design, my username might be something like "Biglaw" to suggest I'm important or prominent in my field, sort of like your choice of "Bignumbers" as an accountant. If I'm otherwise pompous, that is not intentional. I think my posting history shows humility. In this case, I've said show me otherwise on the facts, and I'll stand corrected. For you, an incorrect google search is the law.
-You are on your fourth username because you are both pompous and an agitator... you don't respond with civility when you are shown to be incorrect and blow your top. I'm still on my original user name, by the way.
-What you've shown is not responsive to my request to show a law which prohibits the use of fingerprints in this situation in perpetuity. There could actually be one, and I'm not so informed to know about it. If you find it, that's great, I'll admit I'm wrong. (You've provided a policy which hasn't been shown to apply here, but at least you have decent google skills.)
-Let me give you an example of the police lying to get evidence: Every undercover operation ever. Also, any evidence they obtain is fair game as long as it doesn't violate your charter rights. If you rely on a webpage as your saving grace, all the best to you.
-The big issue here is the safety of the child. I don't know why but I'm not so concerned about the grandparents in this case. The boy is surely blameless however.