Quote:
Originally Posted by Beatle17
Your take on players is different, but not necessarily factual, than other posters. If someone doesn't agree with your evaluation their hockey opinions aren't "damned unbelievable".
|
If it conflicts with all available evidence, it is. There's a lot of stuff posted on here that is the equivalent of saying "Patrice Bergeron is bad at faceoffs". Things that, despite all indications to the contrary, people are willing to put confidently forward. Spit-take level stuff. That's what I'm talking about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red John
You just don't get it. It's not that unconventional opinions are dismissed, it's how you deliver those opinions. Some offer a dissenting opinion but bring it across in a thoughtful respectful way. You don't.
|
I just posted in the Vancouver thread and note that one of your posts responding to my views on Virtanen in there calls me arrogant and hilariously wrong, says that my opinion means nothing, and in the next post you tell another poster his opinion is drivel and he's in denial. None of which I have a problem with really, but you seem just a
touch hypocritical here when it comes to expressing yourself in a respectful way. In fact, opening with "you just don't get it" is no less caustic than anything I've said.