Quote:
Originally Posted by Read Only
As an natural optimist it is in my nature to love all the moves the Flames make and have been guilty of defending way too many of the Flames moves recently but I don't think that is the case here.
It isn't top 3 worst deal of the day because it isn't enough to hurt the Flames or affect how they operate going forward. It doesn't handcuff them, it doesn't prevent them from signing/adding anyone in the future and it doesn't prevent a young guy from playing.
It is too much money yes but not so outrageous or damaging that it matters that much at all.
|
I agree it's not top 3 worst. After looking at the contracts, it currently sits at 4th worst IMO
I understand that it might not impact the Flames immediately, but we don't know what can happen in a year or two and I'd rather take on a bad contract via trade and get something for it rather than just sign our own bad contract.