Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
When the critics of a trade resort to empty, garbage statements like this, it's a good sign we probably won the trade
|
If we traded for a guy like Stempniak, we would say that that is a good use of a valuable asset. If people are going around saying "we probably weren't going to draft anyone useful with that pick anyway" they're just comforting themselves.
Drop by any Chicago board, ask any Chicago fan what they think of this trade. They're all pumped about it. This wasn't a good trade. Hell, at the very least we should have been able to get a better asset than Bolig in return. We shouldn't have to devalue our picks or dig into a guys advanced stats to be able to see why this trade might not end up being terrible.
That's all I'm saying, no need to get all passive aggressive about it. Your post calls mine empty, but literally all you're doing in your own is being passive aggressive. That sucks because I like you as a poster. Just my two cents.