View Single Post
Old 06-24-2014, 03:57 PM   #5872
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

I did a review of the drafts from 1999 through 2008 (10-years). I ranked players using the following criteria:
  • Elite: Top end player like Kane, Crosby, or Toews
  • Top: A player that will play top 4D, is a starting goalie, or would be a top 6F on a playoff team
  • Support: An NHL player that doesn't meet the above criteria
  • Bust: A player that didn't have a meaningful NHL career.

This is what I found:



Notes:
  • There isn't a drop off in success between players selected fourth overall and fifth overall (in fact, the number goes up. Possibly because teams aren't so stuck on taking the "safe" pick)
  • Only 10% of players ended up as elite players (Backstrom in 2006)
  • This draft is notable for a lack of dynamic talent. This has been noted by NHL heavy weights like Bob MacKenzie.

So my points are this:
  • Why not draft Ritchie? He fills more needs than any other player than Ekblad and he potentially has a higher ceiling (potentially) than any other prospect in range.
  • Don't be scared to trade the pick if its going to get you a top NHL talent in the right age demographic.
  • Stop expecting prospects like Baertschi, Monahan, and whomever we draft to be elite players. Especially out of the gate. They are rare outside of the top 2 picks.
  • Stop talking about trading Giordano for another top 10 pick. Especially in this draft. Chances are the drafted player isn't going to be anywhere near as good as Giordano is.
kehatch is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post: