Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
After looking at his twitter timeline, it looks like he is saying that the comparison between Ekblad and Schenn is that they dominated junior because of their physical strength and that strength is covering up major holes.
Also looks like he is arguing that Ekblad might have peaked and has very little room to grow and improve his game.
|
This sounds a bit ridiculous. How could he have already "peaked" at 17/18?
Any and every player at that age has room to grow/improve and take it to another level. And if you look at his stats, there is a vast improvement even from last season to this season, that shows that he's currently on an incline and getting better, not topping out.
The one player in the top class I'd say appeared better because of their physicality/stature is Ritchie, but I wouldn't even deny that he has room to grow too and find another gear in his game.