Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
No, that's what you said about this post from Maritime Q-Scout. You have yet to address this post from driveway where he points out that you were totally wrong about Obama having any sway over the Patent & Trademark Office's ruling in this case since all three presiding judges were appointed during the Bush administration.
Edit: I'll quote it again in full below for your convenience. |
Ahh, the "you colossal idiot" post.
I suppose Ben Bernanke being appointed by Bush meant he would defy Obama right? I mean, because party matters and all when it comes to serving the sitting President? Except he not only complied with QE, he applauded Obama for it. How about George Tenet? He defied Bush so much when it came to Iraq propaganda, right? He was the martyr for truth because he was appointed by Clinton? Oh wait, no he wasn't.
Crappy argument is crap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritime Q-Scout
That's not true though. If that statement was true you wouldn't be arguing on a message board that has no control over the Washington Redskins organization.
Rather, you are so afraid to have logical fallacies pointed out that you won't attempt to use logic to convince others.
|
Yeah, I'm so scared of logical fallacies. I really need the validity of approval from people on a pixel message board to give myself self-esteem. Can someone please agree with me so this poster can have it right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maritime Q-Scout
So I'm clear, your argument is that using a racial slur isn't racist?
I'm honestly not trying to belittle you with that question, I'm legitiatmetly trying to understand your argument.
|
First off, what a slur is depends on who believes it is. You think 70-85% of Americans are racist and have no problem with racism? Start with that before suggesting that people are inherently okay with racism.