Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazrim
And I recall those being tagged as sensationalism, as there was an effort at these very same pressers to tone down that sensationalism.
Based on previous studies, if the peak of the Bow last year was 1740 m3/s, then at worst you're looking at a 1:50 year flood. |
Ok, well I'll yield then, it's possible I heard the sensationalist leanings. As I mentioned in my first post, I believe the tunnel as I know it is a good idea anyway. My conclusion was, fluke or not, worst ever or not, Calgary does show a tendency to flood so a more permanent prevention system would be great in my books. I think we're on the same side on that.