Why are there a handful of people insinuating that because Wideman's available it's because people think he's trash?
I don't get the need to respond to an artilce like this by pointing out Hudler and Wideman are good guys that would be positives if we kept. Of course they are. That's why there's talk of them being valuable. Because other teams would (potentially) give us some value for them.
If the only guys we were willing to move are bad team guys who don't put up points and aren't in the long term plans, it wouldn't even be worth mentioning because no one would want them.
