Quote:
Originally Posted by Antithesis
From all accounts, this was an incredibly inept prosecution. Just error after error across the board. That being said, I would like to think that the public has had enough exposure to DNA evidence in the last 20 years that such evidence alone would be enough to bring in a conviction. I'd like to think it would take days as opposed to months. Then again, the general public often has an incredible ability to disappoint.
|
Yeah, like I said, I still don't know which way it would go. It (the additional public info and perception of DNA evidence) could only help, on the other hand, there is a good possibility it still wouldn't help enough.