Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
If only we had a uniter, we need a great uniter! This is just hopelessly naive understanding of the current problems.
If by uniter you mean a republican in sheep's clothing, a democrat president (which looks like a long-term trend) that just does whatever republicans went then yes, that would work. That president would "unite"
The bottom line is that you're having intense polarization as a reaction to an increasingly insane extremist sliver of a right wing base.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...migration.html
How can you be a "uniter" while looking at the graph below.
 |
How about a toning down of divisive rhetoric. That's what I'm looking for. Hillary is incapable of it, IMO. Again, that has nothing to do with your arguments and the fact that you don't see the importance of it is laughable given the insults you've been throwing at me.
Of course, you don't live here so that could be a reason why you're having trouble understanding such a simple concept.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|