Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator
He does? Where?
|
Not explicitly, he just accepts the premise that homosexuality is immoral for the purposes of argument. I.e., even if it is immoral, it's for God to judge / pass sentence. It's possible that he doesn't really believe that and is simply taking an effective alternative route to pointing out why Scott Esk is an ass, but that's not how it read to me.
Not that it matters, it's some guy on facebook. Not to mention that logic and argumentative method make absolutely no difference when responding to people like Esk.