Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
Layoff the drugs, you may be able to get unstuck.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
However, I said 'constant hate against Feaster' which has been prevalent in many threads. You are not that important.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
It just takes a little stretching of your limited supply of brain cells to understand.
|
First of all, lay off the insults. No one made it personal against you so don't act like you're above anyone unless you're actively trying to become a lightning rod for criticism on this forum.
Secondly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
You fail to understand that the two records can be compared without creating a logical fallacy.
|
Here is your logical fallacy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
Feaster can be judged on his draft record in Calgary in terms of prospect pool depth. Yes, too early to come to conclusion at NHL level. Prior drafting with Tampa has no effect on anything.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
[Burke's] draft record is brutal.
When comes to Treliving same thing, one would think he is a genius of a GM, the truth is, he is a rookie.
|
If you want to make the point that Feaster's prior drafting in Tampa has no effect, then the same holds true for Burke. Therefore there was no reason for you to have brought up Burke's drafting record.
If you really insist that it's logical then there's another problem: you are comparing two records, one with a sample size of two draft years and one with a sample size of 13 draft years. And since you're so smart and I apparently possess some sort of neuron deficiency that prevents me from regenerating brain cells (and yes brain cells do regenerate), maybe you can tell me which one actually has numbers and which one is still to early to judge.
You were wrong from the moment you used to word "prove". Feaster hasn't proved anything yet. I think most of us would be more than willing to credit Feaster if the prospects he drafted turn out to be successful (which would be fantastic). Yes you're right in that the prospect pool is deeper than it has ever been, but it won't mean jack s*** if none turn out to be successful in the NHL. Granted, chances are high and I really hope Feaster showed that Burke made the wrong decision in firing him based on the drafts he made, but as of right now, it's not even close to "proving" anything about Feaster yet.