Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC
I really don't understand keeping goalie interference out of the reviewable plays. It's arguably the most controversial/debated call and is the main reason for people wanting this rule. Just stupid and tells me that the NHL itself still has no idea what constitutes interference and what doesn't.
|
I think this is why. You can't make judgement calls based on video review. Instead of a judgement call by the refs it becomes a judgement call by 3 guys in Toronto.
I think offsides would be the big one that a coach could challenge. Another could be puck over the glass, if it hit a stick or the glass or not.
Icing would be ridiculous, imagine if it should have been icing but was waved off, play continues for a minute+ and someone scores. Then there is a challenge and it really was icing cause the defenseman was an inch ahead at the faceoff dot so the goal was waived off and the faceoff goes back and you can't change players after there have already been line changes.. what a mess.