Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy
ya, that's a curious statement. i would imagine flames trade up likely targeting ekblad, not to for the right to pick who they want of the 3 forwards, rather than having to pick whoever's left at 4. I say this as it just seems the difference between the 3 forwards potential-wise is not all that large.
|
Yeah, I don't see the reason for trading up if it isn't to get
Ekblad. One of the forwards will fall to us anyways and there probably isn't a lot of difference between them.
I guess we could always take Richie at #1 just to annoy some. Of course an Asst. GM would have to re-enforce the smartness of making that pick by saying someone else was going to take him next if we didn't.