I've always thought he was guilty, because there is no amount of money in the world worth paying to be considered a child molester. Fair or not, paying off the first family makes him look incredibly guilty. If the counter to that is it would have been cheaper than going to a trial, I ask what is your reputation worth? Because being considered a child molester is the single worst thing you can be considered on planet earth. And when you pay $25 million to make something go away, it's difficult to make the argument "It was cheaper than a trial" when the alternative is "He looks guilty of molesting kids and is paying this off to go away".
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
|