Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
The cost of inaction is already greater than diversification would have been.
But guys, we don't want to do something that will negatively affect the economy.
|
Good report here:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-0...-iea-says.html
"Investments in renewables, nuclear power and CCS would offer more benefits than costs, according to the agency. It said spending $44 trillion would yield more than $115 trillion in fuel savings."
I don't think that we need to have prosperity or abundance suffer under a reality of clean and safe power generation. On the contrary, using the right technology, we can have quality of life explode for the balance of the planet who largely live without.
It is not an either or situation here.