View Single Post
Old 06-01-2014, 09:07 AM   #558
Coys1882
First Line Centre
 
Coys1882's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strombad View Post
You can have one without the other, and I'll quote someone more intelligent than myself to properly illustrate the point:

"The accusation of man hating and male bashing also shifts attention away from women and onto men in a sympathetic way that reinforces patriarchal male centeredness while putting women on the defensive for criticizing it. In the process, it portrays men as victims of a gender prejudice that on the surface seems comparable to the sexism directed at women. Like many such false parallels, this ignores the fact that antifemale and antimale prejudices have different social bases and produce very different consequences. Resentment and hatred of women are grounded in a misogynist culture that devalues femaleness itself as part of male privilege and female oppression. For women, however, mainstream patriarchal culture offers no comparable antimale ideology, and so their resentment is based more on experience as a subordinate group and men’s part in it."
- Allan Johnson

The main problem is not thinking that #killallmen is Misandry, because if Misandry was a real thing, that WOULD be an example. It's that if you firmly believe that Misandry exists and that you, as a man, are victimised by hatred against your gender perpetrated by women, then you likely exhibit misogynistic tendencies.
As smart as this guy might be that just seems wrong. To me, this logic would also excuse people of being racist against whites - that it in a sense doesn't exist. Am I interpreting this wrong?
Coys1882 is offline   Reply With Quote