Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I disagree with your last point.
I think if your convicted of a crime you can't own a gun. Especially if its violent.
I think there can be some leeway in terms of something like shop lifting obviously.
If a gun is used in a crime it triggers a search of the residence of the gun owner, and all guns are seized. If it was stolen and proven that it was improperly stored, then they lose the right to own a fire arm.
I agree with the tracking of guns, that's a solid idea.
On the militia thing, I think all militia's and their members need to be registered, especially if they're gun owners.
|
I kept getting sidetracked writing that post.
I think all sentences should be contextual, with a general range of punishment, renouncement and rehabilitation.
I don't mean if you rob a liquor store all you have to do is register your gun. But that triggers the guns registration not that you necessarily get to keep it. If you live with your parents, your parents guns get registered via your crime (due to the household trigger).
This was just a thought experiment I put no thought into other than when I typed it.
By l means pick it apart or expand I'm curious how the thought might play out.