Quote:
Originally posted by Flame On+Oct 13 2004, 08:05 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Flame On @ Oct 13 2004, 08:05 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-arsenal@Oct 13 2004, 02:46 PM
Just like Michael Moore taking people comments in context? Moore is trying to get F9/11 on network TV before the elections.
I guess you could say, 1 good turn deserves another.
|
You do realise don't you arsenal that 9/11 was a film you had to pay to go and see, and that it was in an auditorium that would be filled with people wanting to do just that. The public airways is another story is it not? Moore also prepares a case and develops it in his film and he's prepared to discuss it and debate it and has done. Sinclair (David Smith) on the other hand "show this film on our networks so we can influence the out come and then we'll disappear into the night with no chance for rebuttle..." that's dodgy as hell. [/b][/quote]
You seemed to have missed the Second sentance of my comment, which I said "Just like Moore trying to release F9/11 on network tv before the elections".
Could it be becuase he wants to change the outcome of the election?
Could be. I mean there is a reason he made the movie.
I never said I agree with what they are doing, all I said was 1 good turn deserves another.