05-21-2014, 01:53 PM
|
#746
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Relevant to the issue, although the article discusses the topic of irrational beliefs more generally.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blog...paign=20140519
Quote:
Last month, Brendan Nyhan, a professor of political science at Dartmouth, published the results of a study that he and a team of pediatricians and political scientists had been working on for three years. They had followed a group of almost two thousand parents, all of whom had at least one child under the age of seventeen, to test a simple relationship: Could various pro-vaccination campaigns change parental attitudes toward vaccines?
|
Quote:
The goal was to test whether facts, science, emotions, or stories could make people change their minds.
|
Quote:
The result was dramatic: a whole lot of nothing. None of the interventions worked. The first leaflet—focussed on a lack of evidence connecting vaccines and autism—seemed to reduce misperceptions about the link, but it did nothing to affect intentions to vaccinate. It even decreased intent among parents who held the most negative attitudes toward vaccines, a phenomenon known as the backfire effect. The other two interventions fared even worse: the images of sick children increased the belief that vaccines cause autism, while the dramatic narrative somehow managed to increase beliefs about the dangers of vaccines. “It’s depressing,” Nyhan said. “We were definitely depressed,” he repeated, after a pause.
|
|
|
|