Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
No to both, because I don't think anyone knows how good a player he could one day be. I think the likelihood that he will be very good, and the possibility that he could be better than either trumps what Kane provides now, or whom the Flames could draft in the top three.
|
Yeah you know, a year ago or so some of the trade talk could kind of be justified, but at this point you HAVE to see what you have in him before you even consider that. It is much more valuable to the franchise to build their own star player then trade away an exciting prospect for someone else's. Especially one noted to have his own problems and issues with playing in a small Canadian market.
I thought (like you) that he meant Pat Kane first. I still might say no. Definitely no to Evander.