Well its just that he's discussed before the fallacy people make suggesting that the earth had to be where it is because of a diety since it is in the habitable zone.. The fine tuned argument, he's argued against it before when discussing this argument put forth by the religious.
However the exact same argument is made by astrophysicists when discussing the idea of a fine tuned universe, especially when when like Kaku you are a big proponent of the multiverse theory.
That's why he seems disingenuous because I have seen him do this before and its really irritating. I'm pretty sure its appeasement or trying to be all things to all interviewers, you will rarely find him argue or take a stand that will upset people, look how he really tried to distance himself from the discussion on how Stephen Hawkings book said no God is required and then went into the Einstein and how a theory of everything is so elegant that a God could be behind all this...
Anyways don't want to ramble too much about Kaku, he's always been kind of frustrating for me to listen to, and he keeps popping up because he's well liked by so many.
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
|