Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex
Yes, I think that's likely and that it's a bad thing.
I think if the hockey product is poor then the guy in charge of the hockey product ought to be the primary person to hold accountable as soon as possible, not allowed to use someone else as a fall guy and then just continue on.
It just seems like a set-up that will end up with problems being prolonged (and potentially made worse) in the long-run.
|
Or it is a set up that will promote consistency and a long-term commitment to a vision and a plan.