Personally I think he is being honest (but then that's my default reaction to everything), if you read what he wrote with the whole "read only two books in mind" then when he says:
"There's no way George doesn't write in a Dany attack on King's Landing in the last books. Why have her a central character then? "
It could totally be taken that way. Either way. And if it can be taken either way, either he deliberately designed the post to be ambiguous, or it just ended up that way. Hanlon's Razor applies.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|