Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
I get a kick out of people saying that Roy shouldn't win it because all he did was take a team that underachieved last year and led them to a division title this year.
Isn't that the exact argument one would make for actually WINNING the award?
|
You said it yourself. They underachieved big time last season which means the talent was always there and all it took was a coach that wasn't flat out terrible to get improvement. I honestly believe the worst coach in the NHL this season would have guided the Avs to a better winning percentage than Sacco last season. Babcock did more with less.