I might be wrong, but I thought it was changing the structure to reflect more like a board of directors on a company. (ie: CEO, a COO and CFO). Anyone who tries to move on their own (ie: Owners or GM etc.) will have to grab majority buy in from all individuals at the table. This system gives a more balanced input system. Each individual probably has an input weight of let's say 1-2 out of 10 whereas in prior years, owners + Feaster probably had something like 8 out of 10. Removes bullying or deaf ears out of the equation.
That's what I thought. I thought the current structure was closer to a small business where majority shareholder/owner just did whatever he/she felt like. If they were good (Owner or GM), they would listen to the others, but they still held enough power to veto or run amok whenever they felt like it.
|