Quote:
Originally Posted by starseed
How about this scenario: ineedanother uses his kill now to off someone on his list.
|
Starseed suggests that ineedanother kill someone off his list. Ineedanother's suspects at the time included:
GP_Matt
Rathji
GGG
He would later post his suspicions of:
Timbo
activeStick
hmmhmmcamo
Ineedanother chose Timbo to kill who ends up being townsperson. GP_Matt and hmmhmmcamo have ended up being townsperson as well. If you were mafia so far following ineedanother's suggestions seem beneficial to the mafia (even if ineedanother's motives are pure).
First day:
Quote:
Originally Posted by starseed
The mafia should know who each other are, so they will be able to get everyone on board to be active, which would increase the likelihood that we lynch a townsperson. Random is probably best.
|
Today:
Quote:
Originally Posted by starseed
I think hmmhmmcamo posted a list of inactive players earlier in the game, that list would probably be the best to go on, as there would be less time for mafia to boost their post counts if they saw us choosing that as a potential lynching strategy.
|
Completely contradictory. First he says to not go after low posters because Mafia will coordinate, now he's saying following a list of inactive posters?
In addition to following ineedanother's list he's mentioned at least HalifaxDrunk, Kermitology, Rathji, transplant and hmmhmmcamo.
hmmhmmcamo's list that he know wants us to be suspicious of (despite being exact opposite what he initially said) is here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmmhmmcamo
Players with less than 10 posts:
Baxter Renegade 2
Transplant99 2
Oling_Roachinen 3
activeStick 5
CofR 6
agulati 6
Aeneas 8
|
That's a lot of names Starseed wants us to look at. Yet when it comes to voting he seems, and if someone can double check, just to jump on bandwagons without getting his hands really dirty.