Quote:
Originally Posted by Point Blank
And yet you took 4 pages before actually finding something to defend YOUR claim?
It's interested how you expect people to back up their claims with numbers when they're criticizing your claim, and yet you didn't seem to expect it out of yourself.
I don't think it was ever about winning the argument, I think it was more about the way you put your claim out by saying that the voters don't know what the Norris is.
|
It took me 4 pages? Was this argument not predicated on the graph I posted on this very first page of this thread?
How does such a graph not support my claim? How is it not backing my argument with numbers?