Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
I didn't just use 4 "superficial stats".
I applaud strombad for actually taking the time to find something to defend his claim.
But then he ends his post with "you're wrong, as usual".
...
But it's not black and white. strombad did well being the first person to actually do some research before criticizing what I said (although his combined pairing stats are nonsense, especially when you consider the quality of the other defenceman [Seabrook vs Josi & Hamilton], and he knows that).
|
And yet you took 4 pages before actually finding something to defend YOUR claim?
It's interested how you expect people to back up their claims with numbers when they're criticizing your claim, and yet you didn't seem to expect it out of yourself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
This is not an argument anyone can win, so let's stop acting like it.
|
I don't think it was ever about winning the argument, I think it was more about the way you put your claim out by saying that the voters don't know what the Norris is.