You're the only one who said that here. That's all that really matters at it pertains to this discussion.
You also added the gems that those voting "don't know what the Norris Trophy is" and that Keith "shouldn't even have been nominated".
Having a preference toward one of the other deserving candidates is fine, but suggesting one of the best defensman in the league, a former Norris winner, a two time cup winner and a two time gold medal winner (all during which he was a team leader in logging minutes) - shouldn't even have been nominated - is weak. Keith might not be a shutdown type of defender, but his hockey sense, quick decisions and being a catalyst in transitioning the puck out of his own end make him an excellent defensemen. Especially when that's combined with being one of the best offensive d-men in the league.
|