Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
I'm not trying to defend McPhee here (He'd be better than Nieuwendyk, but we could do better than both), however if you want to torture statistics, using the metric of "100 game players drafted between 1998 and 2009" argues that George McPhee is a better drafter than Ken Holland. Holland has produced only 21 such players to McPhee's 25. (Hell, Holland isn't much better than Button/Sutter were - they were at 20 combined)
|
100 games is a bad metric, I might have managed to find the one metric where McPhee is not the worst drafting GM over the that time period. Either way he would be awful for a rebuilding team through the draft.