Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy89
Not only that, but apparently she took a roadside screening test that registered 'zero alcohol content in her blood stream.'
It could be entirely plausible that she was driving along doing nothing wrong - besides going 10 km/h over the speed limit  , and accidently hit the kids cycling three abreast on the road while wearing dark clothing.
If it was me and that version was the truth, then I would be upset that the family was suing me for $900,000 and libeling me throughout the process. In that context it makes perfect sense to toss up a $1,000,000 countersuit.
|
Out of curiousity, where did you see that.
Quote:
|
The report also states: “no breathalyzer was performed” – a point the lawyer intends to delve deeper into, he says.
|
To me its suspicious, that her husband who's a cop was following her along, and then no breathalyzer was performed on her and they were allowed to leave the scene. Call me a conspiracy loon, but this really doesn't smell right.
I get what everyone is saying, this suit is a horrible act, I can understand the parents suing for medical expenses and emotional trauma, her suing for nearly 1.5 million comes across as mean spirited at least.